Rachel's Soap Box

Rachel's Soap Box
Rachel's Soap Box

Wednesday, 16 November 2016

WHAT DOES A TRUMP PRESIDENCY MEAN FOR WOMEN?



16 November 2016

After the shock triumph of Donald Trump against Hillary Clinton in the USA presidential elections a week ago there has been much speculation as to how it happened, and how the pollsters and commentariat got it so wrong.
The post-election analysis will continue for some time. But as the dust settles, the people of America and the world need to know what it is the new President of the Unites States (POTUS) really stands for. 
How much of his rally pledges were hyped-up populist rhetoric and how much contained deep-seated conviction that will convert to actual policy?
In a bitter and divisive election campaign, Trump continued to defy gravity by riding a wave of popularity despite the continued gaffs, insults, blatant lies and scandals. His win resulted in bewilderment for many women, Hispanics, Muslims, blacks and ‘establishment’ politicians that he insulted along the way.
No doubt large portions of these demographics are wondering what a Trump presidency means for them. People in the streets already feel more emboldened to exact hateful and prejudicial behaviours, with violent examples already seen.
Hispanics might fear their families being split up, and if a “great, great wall” will be built between their two countries. Muslims will be questioning if their family members living overseas will ever be able to visit them.
Some relief perhaps for the Gay Community, when Trump said in a post-election interview on 60 Minutes that for him the issue of Marriage Equality was settled. "You have these cases that have already gone to the Supreme Court. They've been settled, and I'm fine with that," he said.

But what will a Trump presidency look like for women?
What will a Trump presidency look like for women? Will men now feel more empowered to act ‘Trumpish’ towards women, at work, on the street, at play and at home? Already in Australia, emboldened as Trump’s lead became apparent on election night, Sydney University students had to be evicted from a prominent campus event after repeatedly chanting, “Grab them on the pussy. That’s how we do it”, along with other Trump-like slurs. 
On the surface, anyone could be forgiven for thinking women’s rights have been set back decades. At least 43 years, anyway. All the way back to 1973 and Roe v Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that recognised an American woman’s constitutional right to make her own personal medical decisions, including the decision to have an abortion.
Despite describing himself as “pro-choice in every respect” in a 1999 interview, today’s Trump is pro-life and is for banning abortions. First, he said women who had abortions should receive some form of punishment. He repositioned that sentiment amidst an outcry, when even anti-abortion campaigners distanced themselves from the remarks.
During the third presidential debate, Trump reinforced his stance by stating he would install pro-life justices to the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v Wade, essentially making it illegal to have an abortion. Whether or not it would actually work like that was the subject of some debate, but his end goal is clear.
Now I’m not going to debate the Right to Life movement here. This is simply a women’s right issue, and to remove that right from women is unarguably setting back progress for women by decades.

A misogynist President-elect
Then there’s the sexist scandals everyone is now familiar with. The way Trump has in the past described various women as pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals; his public humiliation of a former Miss Universe when she put on a few pounds; his treatment of Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly when she questioned him about his treatment of women at the first Republican primary debate, including a Twitter tirade calling her derogatory names.
Then the release of a tape from 2005 revealing a “locker room” conversation he had with TV host Billy Bush, where he openly bragged about groping women and hitting on married women, causing a string of outraged Republicans to disavow the candidate.
On the tape he said as a star, he could do whatever he wanted to women, like kissing them without asking and grabbing them “on the pussy”, among other vulgarities. It reignited the conversation on sexual assault, and millions of women around the world shared their stories of casual sexual assault on social media.
When Trump denied he would ever actually behave in such a predatory manner, a string of women came out in the media stating that he had behaved with them in exactly that manner, even since being with his current wife, Melania.
Melania is the third wife of the self-confessed life-long womaniser, who famously cheated on his first wife with second wife Marla Maples. Perhaps he believed his first wife was simply too old. In a 1991 interview with Esquire, he said, “You know, it really doesn’t matter what they [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass. But, she’s got to be young and beautiful.”
Now no one should be held to account for every single word they ever said, and not expect to evolve or learn from past mistakes. But in the case of Trump, there is an ongoing and endless pattern of behaviour, there are no learnings, and he is unapologetic.
The UK Telegraph even have a “sexism tracker”, where you can find “every offensive comment in one place”. Not very presidential...

Trump in the White House
So with this as the backdrop, what might Trump do when he gets to the White House in January 2017? Will he walk around the corridors of the West Wing announcing “you’re fired” to any woman over thirty, or weighing over 100 pounds, or that he doesn’t find attractive enough? Trump described a similar process when he owned the Miss Universe contest as ‘the Trump Rule’?
Will he insist female staff wear skirts and high heels? Get boob jobs? Will they only be in positions where they take notes, run to get coffee and act as eye candy?
It’s not as absurd as it might sound. There is a clip of him in 2007 talking about hiring a young woman with no experience because she had “world-class beauty”. And according to court documents from a law suit settled in 2012, Trump wanted to fire female employees at his Trump National Golf Club in California that he considered unattractive and replace them with more attractive women.
He regularly refers to small-breasted women as ‘pancake tits’ and once told Howard Stern that any woman who has a breast reduction is 'insane'.
Who he will appoint to key positions will also be telling. Will he surround himself with older white men of privilege like himself? There have already been suggestions his key supporters will get parachuted into prize positions, like former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who has been rumoured to be offered the Secretary of State job after campaigning heavily for Trump.
The positions announced in recent days fit the mould. Trump is already facing a growing backlash at his appointment of his campaign chairman Stephen K. Bannon as his chief strategist and senior counsellor. Bannon has been described as racist, anti-Semitic and misogynistic, and the appointment has been welcomed white nationalist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan. 
What about Trump’s Vice President, Mike Pence? Well there is no friend there for women’s rights. A born-again evangelical Catholic, as most Republicans seem to be, his views on abortion align with Trump’s current stance. 
He has been described as one of the most extreme anti-abortion legislators in the USA and has been quoted as saying, “We’ll see Roe v Wade consigned to the ash heap of history where it belongs."
He is also an advocate of stay-at-home mums, and has opined that, “Working mothers stunt emotional growth of children”. While in Congress, Pence voted against an equal pay for women Act three times.

Will Trump's Win Normalise Sexism?
Of course, the office of POTUS is bigger than just one person and his vice president. But it doesn’t mean damage can’t be done, or has already been done. And with Republicans in control of both houses of Congress, the path to a conservative agenda is relatively uncluttered.
The cultural damage also needs to be considered. For all those good ol’ Midwestern boys who simply believe that a woman should not be in charge of the highest office in the land, their mindset has been reinforced in spades. 
Let’s not forget the obvious in all our post-election analysis; that a highly qualified woman lost the election to a poorly qualified and highly misogynistic and divisive man.What does that say about the electorate's attitude towards women?

A distinct lack of respect for women, vulgar ‘locker room talk’ and rating women based only on their looks and sexual value is a standard that has been set by Donald Trump. Yet he was still seen as fit to hold the highest office in the country, begging the question: will this mindset now be normalised?
We can only hope not. A regression in attitudes towards women would not be helpful, especially in the workplace where women in Australia, even in 2016, are still facing an uphill battle for equal standing.
According to Libby Lyons, Director of the Workplace Gender Equality Agency, work done recently by her agency, the Diversity Council of Australia and KPMG into the causes for the gender pay gap identified bias and discrimination as the single biggest factor (38%). 
She also says the average Australian man working full time earns $27,000 a year more than the average woman, and five out of six CEOs of Australian companies are men.

People Power
But as ALP Shadow Minister Kate Ellis said on the potential ‘Trump Effect’ on Australia, “It’s up to people, good people, to stand and fight for the values that are important to us.”
But is it that simple? Can people power keep a misogynistic culture from further pervading our societies and negatively impacting on the standing of women in the western world?
Protests in city streets across America started the day after the election and continue a week on, NOT MY PRESIDENT the overarching theme. 
A ‘Women’s March on Washington’ is planned for the Capital on January 21, the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration.The message, according to the new movement’s Facebook page, is to “send a bold message to our new administration on their first day in office, and to the world that women's rights are human rights.”
The page says the event will be in solidarity for all those groups that have felt insulted, demonized, and threatened during the election and to move forward.
Another movement known as hashtag Subway Therapy (#subwaytherapy) has taken off exponentially in the days after the election. It gives commuters grieving the Trump win an outlet to shake off the negativity of the Trump message with positive messages written on colourful sticky notes and posted on the subway – and Twitter - walls.
Let’s hope people power like this is sustained enough to keep America, Australia and the world, from slipping backwards in rights for women, human rights and the rights of all marginalised groups by the Trump Effect. Let this be the catalyst to bring uncomfortable conversations to the front line, to call out unacceptable behaviour and continue stand up for our values.
After all, as Chief of Army Lieutenant General David Morrison famously said, “The standard you walk past, is the standard you accept.”
Hold on to your pussies, ladies! It’s going to be a long four years…


********

More Reading...
Still not convinced about the misogyny of the President Elect? 

The TELEGRAPH (UK)
Sexism tracker. Every offensive comment in one place

THE DAILY BEAST; IT'S NOT OK
Amy Schumer, Meryl Streep and More Condemn Trump’s Misogyny

COSMOPOLITAN MAGAZINE
28 Times Donald Trump Has Been Completely Insulting to Women http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a44629/donald-trump-insults-women/

THE DAILY SHOW and THE DAILY BEAST
Clips of Trump Defending a Statutory Rape

THE DAILY BEAST
Donald Trump’s Gross History of Misogyny

FORBS
Why Pence Is A Scary Option For Women And Public Health

LA TIMES
Trump wanted to fire women who weren't pretty enough

ROLLING STONE
A Timeline of Donald Trump's Creepiness While He Owned Miss Universe

Tuesday, 8 November 2016

Playing the Woman Card



There’s a battle that’s been brewing for quite a while now… every now and then it comes to the fore, then things settle down again. With the ramping up of the presidential elections in the USA, the battle is well and truly front and centre.

What battle, you ask? The battle of the sexes! In this case, Trump accusing Clinton of… playing the woman card! Didn’t you read the title?
 
So what is ‘playing the woman card’? And how does one ‘play the woman card’?

Well… I guess, to begin, you need to be a woman. Then you need to have hairy armpits, hate men, and blame every ill you experience in the world on your poor, downtrodden luck of being a woman. Or blame it on a man. You are probably also fat, ugly and stupid and will be referred to as a ‘femnazi’. 

That’s according to one vocal segment of Twitter, anyway. Just one look at feminist writer-broadcaster Clementine Ford’s Twitter feed and you’ll find some of these types telling her how it is. I must add, she often tells them how it is back, as well.

Then, if you’re say, an ultra-conservative right wing columnist, those that ‘play the woman card’ are simply an irrelevant part of the population subject to revulsion and ripe for derision. This group use the word feminist as though it were the most distasteful and despicable thing in the world. 

News Limited columnist Miranda Divine, for example, has taken up the cause as though it were her one mission in life to destroy the word and everything it stands for, taking up the case of the poor ‘menz’ that have been forced by the modern world to tame their sexist ways and be politically correct in a world gone mad thanks to lefty SJWs (SJW = Social Justice Warriors - the new ‘bleeding heart’). 

Nearly every second opinion piece from this champion-of-men woman is full of scathing disdain for anyone that wishes to advance the cause of equality for women. In her latest tirade just days before the US presidential election, for example - the latest in a long list of columns supporting Trump and condemning Hillary - Divine opens by stating… “Hillary Clinton’s last desperate stand is reminiscent of Julia Gillard’s phony feminist protection racket”, referencing her ongoing targeted hate for the first female PM of Australia. 

“…being a woman does not automatically confer sainthood”, Divine goes on to say. WHO SAID IT DOES?!?!? Statements like this, which are a familiar tone with Divine, are used to create a supposition of facts that do not exist in order to invoke a sense of extremism on a topic.

You can see this full article here for a taste of how low-brow and blindly partisan Divine will go. 

After the first presidential debate, Divine opined… “The mainstream media for the most part mistook Hillary Clinton’s smug, catty needling of him [Trump] as poise and command…”

Unless you’re a subscriber you probably won’t be able to get the full lilt of Ms Divine’s diatribes as her News Limited employer puts her words behind a premium content firewall. Now, I won’t dare to make any “smug, catty needling” remarks about the value of such ‘premium’ content, but to me, this is just dog whistling at play. But that’s a subject for another blog another day…

So when Hillary gets accused of ‘playing the woman card’, what does that mean, anyway? The likes of Miranda Divine would have us pretend that if Hillary wins, it’s no big deal that she will be the first female POTUS. But it is a big deal! Just as Barack Obama being the first black POTUS was a big deal. And when the first Hispanic becomes POTUS, that will also be a big deal. 

But we’re not supposed to talk about it. Shhhhh... That’s playing the woman card. 

And including issues such as the gender pay gap on your policy platform… definitely playing the woman card. And bringing up examples of her running mate’s sexism (and let’s face it, that’s being gentle)? Also playing the woman card.

Supposedly! 

I get irritated by all this… at the misguided spreading of the message that if you define yourself as a feminist, or otherwise comment in any way about gender equality in any form, then you are a soft, hideous and fringe-dwelling hobgoblin. Or some variation along those lines… Clementine Ford tells readers herself what some of those variations are here.
 
Our first female PM brought the issue to the heart of the country – and beyond – with her now famous ‘misogyny speech’ in 2012, which was, of course, followed by an ugly backlash of commentary and derision in response for ‘playing the gender card’, by the likes of Miranda Divine and her ilk.  

The fact that ‘playing the woman card’ is interchangeable with ‘playing the gender card’, and that ‘playing the gender card’ is never used in context with men… well that speaks volumes, too.  

However I am not going to commend the existence of gender inequality here. The stats speak for themselves (see below), and if you don’t believe it exists in Australia, you can Google it yourself. Here’s a start… 
 
But I do take exception to the rephrasing of the definition of ‘feminist’ and all the negative connotations that go with it. I’m not saying there aren’t hardcore feminist types that possibly do hate men, or do have hairy armpits, or run around cutting off men’s penises and shredding their egos with their lambasting ways. I’m not talking about political movements or hardcore ideologies. For every opinion or lean there is always an opposite and an extreme view. Just like in religions. But that’s also another blog for another day… 

What I’m talking about is the mainstream, clinical definition of feminism; the belief in equal political, economic, personal, and social rights for women. And a person who supports feminism, by definition, is a feminist. 

Not so hardcore, is it? Nothing about hairy armpits or hating men. I expect every man in my life to be a feminist. And frankly, I would expect any father of a daughter, brother to a sister, son to a mother… you get the picture – to also be a feminist. 

While I’m at it, I also expect every woman to call themselves a feminist as well! Even you, Miranda Divine. Unless you truly believe women shouldn’t have the same opportunities and standing as men? 

Idealistic perhaps, but I prefer to strive for an unobtainable world of harmony and cohesion than be filled with judgmental hate for all those distasteful idealists while I puff on my cigar and dance in contempt.

In the words of Hillary Clinton, “if that’s playing the woman card, then DEAL ME IN.”


* * * *



Here’s some sobering stats from the Australian Human Rights Commission about gender equality in Australia:-

  • Women and girls make up just over half (50.2%) of the Australian population.
  • While women comprise roughly 46% of all employees in Australia, they take home on average $283.20 less than men each week (FTOE)
  • The national gender “pay gap” is 18.2% and it has remained stuck between 15 – 18% for the past two decades.
  • Australian women account for 92% of primary carers for children with disabilities, 70% of primary carers for parents and 52% of primary carers for partners.
  • In 2013, Australia was ranked 24th on a global index measuring gender equality, slipping from a high point of 15th in 2006.